undefined

points

by hansmayer1 hours ago |

comments

by simonw1 hours ago|

[-]

I think that both you and the other major tech outlets interpreted that poorly.

by hansmayer51 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

Oh really? How about the king of non-tech-outlets and digestible, shallow bites for the not-reading-books-middle-class, the Business Insider?

https://www.businessinsider.com/uber-coo-andrew-macdonald-ai...

You know their business is literally correct interpretation of the C-Suite statements.

by simonw42 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

I think Business Insider are not a particularly high quality publication - they're prone to clickbait - and that headline is an example of why I think that.

Hah, I just checked their homepage and here they go again amplifying that COO fragment from that podcast:

https://www.businessinsider.com/tokenmaxxing-debate-uber-exe...

> "That link is not there yet, right?" Macdonald said in comments that went viral, racking up over 2 million views on X. "I think maybe implicitly there is more that is getting shipped, but it's very hard to draw a line between one of those stats and, 'OK, now we're actually producing 25% more useful consumer features.'"

Yeah, something going "viral on X" is clearly a sign that it's quality information!

by hansmayer6 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

So no one got it right? Myself, tech outlets, non-tech outlets, everyone on twitter, etc?

by simonw3 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

That's why I wrote a whole section about it. I was deeply disappointed at how little thought people had appeared to put into this before amplifying the misleading headlines.

For someone who cares about media hype - https://hn.algolia.com/?query=author%3Ahansmayer%20hype&type... - you don't seem to be very discerning with regards to this particular story.