upvote
Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue

(llmgame.scalex.dev)

Fun little game, but I think the questions jump context so much it's a little unrepresentative. It might be better to group things into "packs", which have more real-world representative structure to them. For example, lots of "editing something.js" file permission requests, and then an "npm publish" is far more normal, and it's more of a risk, if you're used to pressing Y lots and then suddenly out of the blue...
reply
Thanks all for checking it out and your suggestions!

If anyone is curious about the actual underlying risks and problems with some mitigations (like the 17% false-negative rates of Auto Mode), I wrote up a quick summary of some of the approaches here

https://scalex.dev/blog/ai-agent-permissions/

reply
That's funny. It told me that blocking "npm run build" was the wrong answer. Maybe it doesn't really under The threat model.
reply
I vibe coded a TUI that just shows running lxd containers

I hit 'n' to toggle all network access minus anthropic and openai URLs.

I use pi (sometimes claude, always on bypass) and I auto allow everything. I only toggle manual approval in rare cases like running a script or command that needs to touch a production system and I need to validate everything.

Normally my container has full write access to staging so it can debug and validate everything on its own

reply
I haven't used local agentic AI yet for programming projects. Hence, -187 score

The filter for "commands I would run myself" and "commands I would let an agent run" are very different it seems.

reply
Fun game. Can somebody run an agent against those questions to see how it performs? :)
reply
[delayed]
reply
I am mostly using OpenCode and barely ever see a permission prompt. While they do enforce it for outside workspace read/write, with the bash tool the agent can just bypass that. I'm not quite sure why it is that way, and it certainly isn't a very good solution, but likely not worse than asking for everything which just trains the user to always accept and provides a false sense of security then.
reply
It would be cool to see the distribution of all player scores.
reply
That's a great idea, stay tuned
reply
Continue? Y/N ── SCORE: 2,343 Security-Conscious Engineer

Caught 8/8 threats "Not a single secret leaked"

→ llmgame.scalex.dev

reply
some of the sandboxing ive been playing with gives me the best of both yolo and like logic programming tier perms on llm actions in env. still not ready for prime time though ;)
reply
deleted
reply
1,640 points on my first try—I fell into a few traps, but it was really interesting. Thanks for the little game! I'm sharing it with my coworkers :)
reply
Use this and save yourself:

claude --dangerously-skip-permissions

reply
Just make sure to run it in an isolated environment where it's ok to mess things up, and make sure it doesn't have access to any secrets.
reply
This is why having a human in the loop isn't enough because they will cut corners and skip reviewing what they should review.
reply
I created a watcher for this problem, to watch my PRs for unfinished scope and have a fresh Claude review

Uses tmux and gh https://github.com/Kyu/claude-pr-watch

reply
A tool that pushes people into permissions fatigue is in fact the proper recipient of the blame. The tool in question here is the entire system though, including the OS with insufficient permission boundaries in userspace, not just the agent
reply
I love it when Claude is dangerous
reply
I got tired of typing that and just do

    alias claude="claude --dangerously-skip-permissions"
I do have a separate "claude" user on my system without sudo access and without access to my main user home dir

And yeah I know that's not perfect but I'm trying to get shit done

reply
alias claude+="claude --dangerously-skip-permissions"

alias claude++="claude --dangerously-skip-permissions --continue"

reply