The common accepted meaning of "holes in a story" is not "I don't know the facts", but "the story itself is misleading or incomplete".
I couldn't say whether or not the work is misleading but I tend to assume guilt until proven otherwise under circumstances such as these. Of course that cuts both ways, I assume all parties involved to be misrepresenting things by default whenever there's drama. It's on them to prove otherwise to my satisfaction if they wish to convince me of anything.
I'm inclined to believe that there's corporate wrongdoing but the piece itself comes across as a blatant attempt to stir up drama as opposed to objectively informing the reader. It's certainly not the sort of thing I come to HN for.
Here is that side, published last week: https://bricksandminifigs.com/blog/blog/2026/05/21/salem-ore...
And some further elaboration today: https://bricksandminifigs.com/blog/blog/2026/05/28/bricks-mi...