You can just short SpaceX of an amount equivalent to its share of your SP500 holdings. You will have to pay borrowing costs though, but on something that liquid it will be very small.
So eliminating SpaceX exposure will cost you $100 per million of your SP500 ETF per year, or so.
Personally I would still probably go with the long put strategy unless the price difference is exorbitant.
The ETF is this case follows the index, so there's really no surprise.
> I would still probably go with the long put strategy
Just, don't. There is a world of complexity between a simple short, and entering an option contract with non linear pnl.
Also there is no liquidity issue, we're talking SP500 names here, you'll pay GC, which should be around 25bps as the other comment mentions.
P.S. Here's an example of S&P500 without the magnificent 7 https://www.defianceetfs.com/xmag/
I think it's less complicated than you'd think.. just buy LEAPS puts proportional to your exposure.
I'm very interested in seeing how the market prices these options after the IPO.
Sure you can make a lot of money but only if you know when to get out before the crash. And that's something that doesn't gel well with long term investment.
Long term dollar cost averaging is not about hype and fomo. Overall pricing in equities does vary according to alternative investment routes, which is why I'm diversified into those as well.
Stonks go up. Stonks go down. Averaging over decades, ownership is about owning a share of productive output of a large portion of our entire economy, an amazing restructuring of social relations that presents an amazing opportunity for the common person, unseen throughout the history of humanity.