upvote
They already do both.

The real competition is coming out of China right now and I doubt the Chinese government is going to let them buy out their "fast follower" AI companies that are consistently 6-12 months behind in terms of quality. That said, I'm factoring quality as in Opus 4.5/Sonnet 4.5/GPT-5.5 as break points since I haven't really seen an improvement since that point when using AI.

reply
They'll just lobby to ban Chinese models as they're already doing.
reply
You speak so authoritatively about quality and performance of these models, yet there are no quantitative metrics that correlate to real world outcomes that indicate that the quality and performance of these models is anything but subjective noise and classic benchmark nonsense.

A company consumed half a billion dollars worth of tokens in a month and nobody noticed anything until the bill came due.

Tha $500m dollars is roughly equivalent to 2000 people working for a year or 500 people working for four years, they can and would accomplish a lot if they worked in companies that add value to the economy by solving real problems.

reply
Indeed Its irrelevant. Each firm will make its own cost-benefit analysis, especially since the frontier labs are raising prices.

Marketing only takes you so far in creating noise.

Its weird seeing this focus on bench marks again - PC's did this for quite some time. But in the end it came down to - what does all this additional horsepower let you do? Oh create interesting apps, multi-tasking etc. Which was really the value-add.

reply
The question is not "if" they will lose their ethos but "how long will it take".
reply
If "Open AI" was their ethos, it was lost immediately. I'm not sure what the ethos of Anthropic is.
reply
I gather most of the ethos behind Anthropic is "we don't want to work with Sam".
reply
Go public so everybody can benefit?
reply
corporate pursuit of monopoly is as sure a phenomenon as gravity
reply
I’m curious which will start producing hardware be it robotics, consumer or commercial devices, chips, energy infrastructure or transforming shipping crates into housing for jobless humans. Maybe even tanks of gel with arrays of humans in suspended animation reading our biometrics, thoughts, pumping in nutrients and training on the data. O_o
reply
IPO won't lose their ethos. Competition out from their duopoly will.
reply
Who else right now is making competing models that are roughly as capable? Now factor in hardware availability / future delivery contracts and capital requirements for building datacenters and running new training. If you're trying to compete and lease all that with VC money or loans, good luck actually competing.
reply
There is significant first-mover advantage for torching your ethos.
reply
> if their company ethos remains the same.

What? In what way would the change? They are already raising prices..

reply
what is their company ethos? They are some of the most despicable tech companies in my opinion.
reply