upvote
Show HN: Eyeball

(eyeball.rory.codes)

A modern take on Matthias Wandel's classic [0], which has you guess a variety of geometric attributes (e.g. angle bisection, centroid locating, shape regularization), not just simple partitioning of a line.

[0] https://woodgears.ca/eyeball/index.html

reply
Oh that version actually made sense.

Going back to our newer game, I realized that I am supposed to figure out where the number given should fall on the line.

A case study in modern useability - looks a lot cooler, can't figure it out.

reply
This is great. If only the little square tool would disappear while I make adjustments though - it's just enough of a distraction to barely miss.
reply
Oh wow - that is very cool. Thanks for sharing.
reply
Just want to say thank you for sharing your project. Very fun, and I wouldn't know about Matthias Wandel's version if not for yours!

Also, both of these tickled my brain in a great way. I think a potentially fun continuation would be to "eyeball" physics. For example, throw a ball and pause the physics before it hits something (ground, object, who knows?) and guess the location. Or show two objects about to collide with certain shapes and masses and guess what one of them will hit first and where.

reply
Love it!

It would be great to have a 'training' mode, where you get to repeat ones you miss. This would increase the learning speed.

Easy training- repeat the one you just borked Medium training- cycles through say 5 examples until you get all five within your target range (1%, 0.1%, whatever)

reply
Cool idea - thanks! I'm building a mobile app as we speak so I'll add it for sure.
reply
It's interesting that there are, at the time I'm commenting, 11 new users commenting on this submission, some commenting multiple times. I wonder what the effect of "share my score" type pages have on account creation.
reply
yes, was thinking the same. but it's also weird that the amount of new users commenting is so much higher here. wonder if that is just not a coincidence.
reply
I was 0.06% off on eyeball. Beat me: https://eyeball.rory.codes.

This is fun!

reply
> perfect - you picked 0 · off by 1 (0.03%)
reply
0.10%, but on a touch screen.
reply
I was 0.00% off on eyeball. Beat me: https://eyeball.rory.codes

Lucky punch, on a touch screen!

reply
Almost: 0.07%, allegedly 'perfect'. Getting an early win makes the game so much more 'playable'.
reply
Why does an early win matter? Isn't it random?
reply
https://eyeball.rory.codes/ I was 0.20% off on eyeball. Beat me: https://eyeball.rory.codes
reply
I reached 0.05% and retired for the day.

https://postimg.cc/MXBQqrXf

reply
deleted
reply
deleted
reply
I love these simple games that take 2 seconds to understand the rules.

Off by 6 on my iPad by mis-clicking. Very satisfying!

reply
Thank you!
reply
The low contrast of this website hurts my eyeball
reply
The fact that the numbers are in a brighter color than the end marks, and that the numbers go inwards, makes it slightly more difficult than it would otherwise be, because the eye is biased by the more prominent space between the numbers being different from the line between the marks.
reply
Nice! Would be nice to see your progress over time (if you got better, also as a function of speed...)
reply
I didn't think I'd be any good at this. What I didn't expect is how wildly inaccurate I'd be on every single goddamn attempt lmao it's like I completely lack whatever part of your brain is required to do this
reply
Great idea! Have you considered storing triplets <range, correct number, selected number> for each try and making image plots of these (x/y coordinates are correct/selected numbers, color of each pixel represents frequency) for multiple users for each range? I think the image might reveal interesting properties of human eyeballing, like near-perfect accuracy around 50%, but with less obvious correlations.
reply
Very cool idea! Will try and add.
reply
0.11% by luck, because I actually got lucky the target number was too close to zero, out of a big scale.
reply
Well I suck.
reply
I built it and still suck, don’t feel so bad.
reply
I love these kind ones! Really engaging also yes as someone commented, the training mode would be an awesome idea.

Also, I tried this on laptop as well as my phone, I liked it more on my phone (I know the whole point is about precision though)

reply
I'm* building an app currently!

*my old pal Claude

reply
Cool idea, love how simple it is. Minimal and clean.
reply
This is fun but you need to put "click the line" higher on the page. It took me a while to figure out what I was looking at.
reply
Just any kind of contrast between foreground and background would help.
reply
same happened to myself as well.
reply
Definitely need an iOS version! An angle version on a circle would be nice too.
reply
Just wrapping up the beta for iOS! Will let you know asap.
reply
What does native give you that this doesn't?
reply
10 round avg 4.5%.

A time limit would make sense imho. For extra challenge, add diagonal or curved lines.

reply
Oh, this is actually fun! How about if you change the target every few seconds to add a bit of pressure.
reply
10 perfect hits in a row!

...

handleClick({clientX: els.bar.getBoundingClientRect().left + els.bar.getBoundingClientRect().width / state.n * state.target })

reply
love it, pulls you in after a first try)
reply
800

0 out of 1,600

I still missed. Even when there was centered text.

Maybe the human is the weakest link

reply
this is fun and helping me get grounded :). adding a timer would be a good idea, I think.
reply
i got a 0.00% after 3 tries!
reply
Really fun! I am pretty much blind
reply
Simple premise, oddly hard to put down.
reply
this was fun
reply
this is fun!
reply
pretty fun!
reply
i made 0.87%
reply
my best is 0.08%
reply
> I was 0.00% off on eyeball. Beat me: https://eyeball.rory.codes

(It was pure luck)

reply
my avg was around 2% not able to do more than that lol
reply