upvote
At a basic level, methods of combining oligos to produce long strands have been known for ages. The challenge is to be able to produce them with low enough error, high enough yield, and enough freedom on sequence. Low error improves your yield, reduces the amount of purification and amplification needed, and lets you make longer strands. Sequence constraints can be significant, too, especially around repeats.

If you're talking about Twist's gene fragment product, they advertise that as maxing out at 5 kb. Most, if not essentially all, of that month delivery time is likely the combination, not the oligo pool production. I think the Sidewinder people are actually using Twist pools; they're doing up to 12.5 kb.

By comparison, we recently needed something in the 20 kb range, with a not-so-great sequence, and it was a multi-month process to have a company produce it.

reply
https://ansabio.com/ advertising 50 kb
reply
How is ANSA bio? I just got hit up by a recruiter for this company at random, and now I see them mentioned on Hackernews
reply
> not-so-great sequence

are the limits on not-so-greatness for sidewinder known?

reply
Yes. Whole genome sequencing has... some limits. CYP2D6 for instance is an important gene address, yet is rather hard to sequence do to its many copies and minor mutations. If you don't use targeted copy callers, it can be hard to correctly sequence in WGS.
reply
> Yes. Whole genome sequencing has

We're speaking about gene synthesis, not about DNA sequencing

reply
12kb, you can get three gblocks in a week and change and have them assembled in two days.
reply