upvote
I think Conway's law is more interesting. It seems natural that networks of human relationships would mirror each other when the same groups of humans translate themselves into a new context.

Whereas the structure of technological products is a "different thing" than the human relationships that created it, it's less obvious that it would translate across that boundary.

reply
> “structure of technological products”

Unless the technology is glued together with ad-hoc systems using email, slack, Dropbox, and the like. At least that’s my experience in small businesses.

reply
Reminds me of the whole "Python is for Brahmins" stuff at Microsoft India office.
reply
Looks like it was a satire? I couldn’t find any authoritative sources on it.

https://www.m9.news/social-media-viral/viral-microsoft-caste...

reply
What? Can you explain?
reply
The was a lawsuit that they only allowed favoured castes to use Python.
reply
I think it’s about software engineers, who are supposed to be impervious about effects of caste structures and hierarchy, judging programming languages from the caste lens.

That is my interpretation, please don’t hold me against it

reply
The exact quote "python is for brahmins" brings up top links on incels.is and 4chan, so perhaps OC's character is something worth dismissing.
reply
This is a bizarre reply? IIRC there was a law suit involved
reply
That's how the story goes, yes.

It's satirical fiction. There was no lawsuit, just blogs saying there was.

https://www.m9.news/social-media-viral/viral-microsoft-caste...

reply
[dead]
reply