So you don't actually have any evidence to support your claim? This just seems like a matter of faith at this point, that's fine.
replyI don’t think you have either?
replyIt’s and interesting point. I’ve done a bit of searching and am also empty handed.
>I don’t think you have either?
replyI don't know how I could? The indices have already provided their reasoning for these rule changes, but that's just summarily rejected by the conspiracy-minded.
To laymen this appears to be a grand conspiracy. Rules are being changed to accommodate big companies, that's usually bad.
To people in the financial industry, it's fait accompli. The indices exist to reflect the market, these IPOs are going to be big enough that the 90s-era rules will/would result in untenable divergence.