> "incredibly" is doing a ton of work here.
replyLook, I don't want to argue about something dumb like that, but you can give it basic instructions of what the UI should look like, how to group things, and an example image from a designer, and it will nail the result. If you don't think that's incredible, that's fine. I do.
Yes... it translates lint. Probably a more useful thing, if mechanical.
replyClaude is very good at design IF you encode your design system/specs into skill files (or similar).
replyOpus 4.7 made this a practical approach. 4.8 improved it. Fable 5 has improved it more.
> "incredibly" is doing a ton of work here.
replyso this is why claude talks like this, i was wondering where it was getting this verbal tick from.
>This is still not in the range of shippable UI for top end companies.
replyGiven the shit we've seen shipped by "top end companies" (all the way to Apple) I seriously doubt that. I'd say you're nitpicking from an artistic point of view or something.
This. Today's models easily jump over the bar you need for basic usability and intuitive UX. If it's doing weird things, you are holding it wrong.
replyMight need some additional prompting? I haven't tried fable but gpt 5.5 and gemini 3.5 flash are... Ok on first pass but if you're specific about what you want they can usually get it.
reply[flagged]
replyThe iOS Preview app begs to differ.
replyDude, I've been using OS X/mac OS for decades, and working in UI as well. Apple ships all kinds of half arsed shit, compared to which even regular Claude UIs can be masterpieces (functionality AND look wise).
replyBy what measure?
reply