> it's speed bump at best
replyTo be fair, speed bumps work. If it's actually speed bumping nefarious activity, that gives authorities more time to react.
The correct place to police rogue nucleotides is at the labs. Not the compute layer.
> speed bumps work
replyYea. To slow you down. They don't prevent you from getting somewhere.
> To slow you down. They don't prevent you from getting somewhere
replyAgain, yeah. That's how fences work, too. And alarm systems. Pretty much anything that isn't foolproof. Pointing out that a defence is surmountable isn't a rejection of it per se.
Fences and speed bumps are hilarious defences if we are supposed to believe AI companies about the dangers of this technology.
replyHaving no safeguards is probably safer than having safeguards which do nothing but create a false sense of security.
Idk, whether we believe them or not, I believe the life scientists who are calling for regulation around the labs that produce DNA sequences. If they’re concerned, regardless of whether I trust the AI labs, speed bumps could help by giving those scientists a reasonably window in which to be notified and act.
replylol, you can’t run Fable on $200k of hardware, nor does that get you the model weights, so you’re not making much sense
replywhat does this mean
replyWell you see when a daddy H100 and a mommy H100 meet....
replyyou don't get the model when you buy the data center, & no amount of running smaller models on a tiny 200k$ "cluster" (that's like one 4 gpus node, not even 8) will get you remotely close to Fable 5 level performance
replyUh huh
reply