upvote
It is much more reasonable to do it in a visible / flagged way. At least you have visibility over the quality of service you get as a customer.

Silent treatment is a breach of trust, what you buy changes depending on the context based on the goals of the producer. It is like your computer silently blocking ads from competitors at the hardware level, which is crazy. I think they erred on the wrong side of things due to IPO pressure.

At least there is competition from multiple companies. Still it is best to have personal benchmarks for the domain you are working on to have a real evaluation of the value you get for the money/time you spent on these products. Without trust, that might be the only way forward to keep the companies honest.

This happens eventually in all sectors, a good magazine/website that does independent product evaluation is priceless. Sadly, the new ad-driven internet decimated those that worked great in the 90/00s. Still there are independent blogs that does some evaluation and that is better than nothing.

reply
Imo that's a big win. The LLM just gaslighting you into suboptimal approaches was insane.
reply
I guess, but yesterday Anthropic had their version of Google removing the "Don't be evil" from their motto. They destroyed a metric ton of goodwill they'll never regain.
reply
Yeah, they showed their true colors there. This, compounded with the fact that they're the only frontier lab with no open models, tells you all you need to know. Tired of the insanely patronizing (+ conveniently and overwhelmingly self-serving) attitude out of them. My goal is to own my computing and be able to choose what to do with it.
reply
And just a few days ago i was being called out because i considered anthropic "evil"

I mean, did nobody ever get the vibes, never see a pattern emerging? (well they don't or they wouldn't be so amazed by pattern recognition machines on steroids)

reply