upvote
The can’t comply even if they wanted to because employees: Most frontier staff is foreign origin.

https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-54695598

And they just had their TAM killed days ahead of IPO.

reply
I, like, can't even imagine how they're dealing with this internally. Presumably Anthropic is using Mythos to train future models, but now many of their researchers can't use what they themselves created? Do they just need to stop work now?
reply
Based on all I know about Deemed Exports wrt software and current US controls on software Deemed Exports, your read is spot on.

The phrasing of the foreign nationals implies a Deemed Export control, which is already in place for software for stuff like drones or space satcomms.

If it's a Deemed Export control, it's a strategic position and not a knee jerk reaction about cybersecurity threats.

It's a coherent read too; if Fable can solve coding and build biological weapons (X to doubt) - well then terminal guidance and autonomous drone controls should be a piece of cake for it and that software is already under Deemed Export restrictions.

reply
It’s not because of course it’s all vibed (what’s the criteria?) and we know it doesn’t work

https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-54695598

As it stands there is no way to comply days before IPO and no effective remedy.

reply
> I'm guessing Anthropic shut of access for everyone because currently they have no reliable way to know whether a user is or is not a US citizen.

They literally say this is why.

reply
Even if they could practically restrict access to US citizens only, I would expect them not to - it would be hard to regain that once lost and they need a global market for growth.
reply
> it would be hard to regain that once lost

Harder than regaining the ability to sell access to the model at all?

reply
I find it most likely that this export ban means only USG has access to Mythos/Fable rn. Given the reports of NSA and DoD using Mythos it's now being given a near weapons-grade status by the government.
reply
Your defending the US Administration wanting ID verification built into our devices like going through airport security because you think they think it is 'pro-US'?
reply
No, where did I say that? All I said was that I can see the logic - doesn't mean I agree with it. This policy sucks for me personally, as a non-US citizen.
reply
I see I got that impression by you saying their phrasing of the facts was 'odd'.
reply
deleted
reply