If human abilities were different then human laws would be different. We don't have speed limits for joggers but we do for cars because their abilities are materially different.

That‘s the magic trick you are doing with your analogy. You just assume that human/machine analogy is true.

This argument is pretty lame.

There are already a bunch of replies pointing out ways in which your metaphor breaks down, but here's another: the super intelligent speed reading human is not a "work" (in the sense of "derivative work").

Also, if I'm understanding your position, why wasn't your scenario about the human pirating the books and then reading them? It should make no difference if you really believe knowledge can't be stolen; both situations should be equivalent.

Are humans allowed to do that?

The moment the LLMs ingested any code under GNU General Public License or similar licenses and reuse it without making the produced product available under the same terms...