upvote
Or we could... hear me out... build more power plants. The de-growth stuff is pretty evil when you take it to it's logical conclusion of population control.
reply
There's a bit of a difference between population control and reaching a sustainable equilibrium. One can also argue the death of all life on earth is a pretty evil logical conclusion of infinite growth on a finite planet.
reply
What does "sustainable equilibrium" mean?

What are you balancing if not human growth? And how do you plan to do that?

reply
Doesn't it kind of work itself out?

If it’s unsustainable population growth there will eventually be some catastrophic environmental effects and the population will be reduced to a sustainable level. Of course living during that reduction could be a rather unpleasant experience but it probably also won’t last too long.

If it’s already sustainable everything is fine.

reply
Do not confuse curiosity and caring for extremism.

If someone said they pick up trash on the side of the road to help the environment you wouldn't say the logical conclusion of their ideology would be that they become the unabomber

reply
In a similar vein, the solar-powered website. [0]

[0] https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/about/the-solar-website/

reply
It's not more sustainable though. It takes more energy to grow the food to get the calories to metabolize to turn the crank than it would to run an electric motor or a engine to do the same work.
reply
Totally true that what is and is not sustainable is more complicated than it first appears.

I think what I'm honing in on is the idea that hand cranks produce very limited, often interrupted power and are relative low-tech, both of which are directionally the right way for us to be putting our efforts.

reply
I would love a crank-powered router. Would be a good way to curb internet addiction!
reply