upvote
> But that is far from the truth

Just install a Russian locale on your computer to prevent malicious programs even starting and get on with your day because it's the truth.

Snowden is a free man in 2026 despite the United States of America very much wanting to put him in jail.

reply
Taking things down doesn't help much unless the platform has something in place to make it hard to recreate them.

>they could do the hard job of combining leads and working with appropriate agencies to maybe find and prevent these things over time

At least in the U.S., everyone will cry government overreach and no one will fund it. In other countries, they should probably just ban U.S. platforms unless they're reachable and actually resolve these type of problems.

reply
> just ban U.S. platforms

Try that and see your champagne exports be tarriffed with 100% in no time.

reply
china seems to be doing fine. what are you gonna do, tariff the country that makes all your stuff? 100% tariff on iphones and macbooks?
reply
Won't that require laws that allow the said agency to compel LinkedIn or whatever tech company to actually pay attention and take action? Like laws compelling tech companies to unlock the bootloader once they stop supporting a device.

I wonder why such common sense laws don't exist and who is preventing them from being introduced and passed despite wide public support in general?

reply
I'm not a lawyer but it would be odd if a government agency couldn't communicate a possible threat to a tech company. It is in a company like LinkedIn's best interest to set up a phone number/channels for a centralized agency to communicate potentially malicious accounts and other emerging threats. I suspect that actually already exists for big companies. I doubt they are required to -do- anything without laws but this seems like a win that is easy for all sides. The problem is likely mostly on the US (and other govt) side of things. No clearly defined agency with a clear mandate, resources and leadership to take on this task.
reply
You're describing the FBI or your state level equivalent. And they actually do exactly what you are describing, but in measured efforts. I've even had them come by my place of employment before. They clearly lack the resources to work at this scale though.

The problem with a phone number you suggest is that it will get spammed and abused with fraudulent imposters too (the complete and utter destruction of trust in phone calls and text messages should also be corrected by the government, but that's a different topic).

https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/cyber

reply
Sounds like socializing the harms instead of requiring these companies to bear the burden themselves. Could still be a valid approach but I'm afraid it will make them take less responsibility, not more.
reply
whilst reducing crime is an honorable objective, as we all know, increasing the wealth of tech billionaires must take priority.
reply
Won't that just create another channel for social engineering to delete a victim's account?
reply