upvote
Was that creaking sound your knee or mine?
reply
Hard to say, drkoop.com is a landing page now
reply
And don't forget StumbleUpon...
reply
Speaking of StumbleUpon, I'm not sure whether this was just luck or something about its recommendation algorithm/social graph, but it was the only service where I didn't see the usual flood of traffic followed by rapid decay, the classic Slashdot/HN effect. The curve felt much smoother.

I remember some bloggers at the time describing the same thing [1].

I'd be curious if anyone knows more details.

[1] https://mark.blog/2007/10/23/the-stumbleupon-effect/

reply
I can see how that kinda makes sense.

We used StumbleUpon to visit interesting sites we wouldn’t otherwise find. It didn’t exist to keep you deeply engaged with a main StumbleUpon website.

The aggregators are meant to be the destination. The links are more like shiny dangling lures. Some of them (reddit) do everything they can to keep you from having a reason to leave the page at all.

So I suppose it would follow that one gets people engaged in your site, while the other kinda tries to keep them from doing that.

reply
Delicious!
reply
For those not in the know, this is a reference to del.icio.us, one of the OGs to use Domain (Name) hack technique.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delicious_(website)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_hack

reply
Ha, a new/old webring. If you are reading this and know what that is, it's time for your prostate/mammogram check-up.
reply
Haha or colonoscopy.
reply
Kinda reminds me of DMoz.
reply
Curlie is the successor to DMOZ: https://curlie.org/docs/en/about.html

But Curlie doesn't appear in the website linked in the parent post.

reply
itsbeen84years.gif

Dmoz! Those were the good days. :-)

reply
> Now the search engines aren’t the challenge

Although it can still be a gamble whether a small site made it to DuckDuckGo (Bing’s crawler)

But that only affects about seven of us anyway so your point stands

> Submit It

Trying to remember a different one…

reply
ya i cant believe im seeing this again
reply