> If you want a smarter AI, it needs to have not-dumb memory.

Who says? According to what metric? How would you prove that assertion?

> Now the memory isn't dumb, so the results are better. (And the article shows you why it's better)

But, it doesn't. It explains what they built, and how it behaves. It does not show why it's better than any other alternative for making models "smarter", somehow.

[flagged]