upvote

points

by Panzer046 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby gacgacgac5 hours ago|
next
[-]
Yes they absolutely can? Anyone can. I can.

The thing the GPL requires is that I also provide it for free. Now, why would anyone buy a free thing? To support the devs. To encourage this sort of business model. To get a build that's known to be working and supported and not have to deal with the hassle of compiling things themselves.

reply
upvoteby kcb5 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
That's not it. They will keep the assets closed and under license. There will be no free version of the full game.

Not sure why we should encourage using open source as a vehicle to market and get free work building your fundamentals. Just to reap the profits yourself later.

reply
upvoteby Teifion4 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
The multiplayer game (the thing available now) will remain free including all the updates and improvements to it. What will be behind a one-off-payment will be the campaign. We've had a few bad actors spread word that the entire thing is going to be behind paywall, microtransactions, pay-to-win etc but none of that is true.
reply
upvoteby netsharc5 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
I'm pretty sure you can. But if it's GPL, you need to provide source to the buyer, and the buyer can publish that source for free.
reply
upvoteby inigyou6 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
Yes they can. Firstly, you can do anything and then someone may or may not sue you for it and they may or may not win. Secondly, if you're the copyright owner you can do whatever you like.
reply
upvoteby kcb5 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
I think their plan is to make assets closed licensed. It's all pretty lame. Now any open source code contribution is packaged up and sold with someone else getting the check.
reply
upvoteby falcor844 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Fighting fire with fire, what's to stop me from using GenAI "create new versions of all of these assets but with a Norse twist" and publish these under my GPL+CC BY-SA 4.0 fork?
reply
upvoteby etdznots3 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
They’ll probably suck and the only person that will care is you.
reply
upvoteby orthoxerox3 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Nothing at all.
reply
upvoteby fluoridation5 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
The owner of the copyright can do as they please with the licensing. What I've not seen is someone retroactively changing licensing terms, but even that might be possible.
reply
upvoteby gertrunde6 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
The blurb in game suggests the multiplayer side of things will be open, the 'premium' thing on steam gives the one closed bit, which is the single player campaign.

(In theory!)

reply
upvoteby insanitybit6 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
What do you mean?
reply
upvoteby PtaQQ4 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Hi, PtaQ here, Community manager for BAR. The idea behind the monetisation is to sell what has been built through the publishing funds. Everything available today and a lot more content will be released for free too and always available.

Basically, the paid content will boil down to a single-player campaign.

The funds help us finish and release the game which still needs a lot of focused effort which is not something you can reliably sustained without commissioning some of that work.

The post below explains it in detail.

https://www.beyondallreason.info/news/beyond-all-reason-and-...

reply
upvoteby 4 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
deleted
reply