In a way, this discussion here is proof as to why human code review is necessary.

- The paper is garbage, and a human review process would reject it.

__As is the case in this discussion__. The sentiment of the discussion section (at the time of writing) seems to be in favor of rejecting this paper. (Of course, to make it a proper experiment, one would need to also give the paper to a "generative AI" reviewer to see if it would reject it or not, but I cannot bother.)

It seems they didn’t even do any research. This is not science, it’s just an opinion.