upvote

points

by FLHerne7 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby phlsa6 hours ago|
next
[-]
Yeah, I found that part odd too.

Also, you can found a GmbH and only pay in 50% of the €25k. My understanding is that you're still personally liable for the rest, but it lowers the hurdle to founding a GmbH at least somewhat.

reply
upvoteby nradov6 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
If a company collapses while having more liabilities than assets then that's fine. No one is being forced to extend any credit to them.
reply
upvoteby t0mas881 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
That's the American viewpoint, right of the strongest, sue if they wronged you. European systems typically have a different philosophy where the counterparties are more protected.

It's expressed in stronger consumer protection laws, but also these German things where you can't start a GmbH/LLC with zero capital and wish the counterparties good luck suing you if you never pay them.

reply
upvoteby nradov54 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
You're missing the point. Strong or weak has nothing to do with it. If you want to be protected then don't do business with undercapitalized counterparties. Everyone can make their own decision on acceptable level of financial risk. It's stupid for governments to dictate this.
reply
upvoteby margalabargala12 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
How do you know if your counterpart is undercapitalized, though?
reply
upvoteby zymhan3 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
It will make it harder for "worthy" companies to get loans and credit.
reply
upvoteby woah2 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Is that why it's so hard to get capital, credit, loans, and investment in the USA?
reply
upvoteby nradov1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Nah. Lenders are free to do whatever credit checks they like. Government doesn't need to get involved.
reply
upvoteby hypendev5 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
That system is silly.

I can open a company, work for a year, acrue debt, acrue tax debt, close it.

Nothing will happen. Company "estate" will be sold to cover the debt, which can also be nothing.

reply
upvoteby JanSt3 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
No, if you don't handle this correctly you become personally liable
reply
upvoteby jojomodding2 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Probably criminally liable for bankruptcy as well. At least in Germany (where I am vaguely familiar with the law) you lose bankruptcy protection for debts you take on that are knowingly not covered by existing assets or expected future income. This is usually hard to prove, but if your assets are 0 and there was never a viable plan all along they'll likely found you guilty. This means you become personally liable to the creditors and might also face jail time.
reply
upvoteby ccozan1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
In Germany yes, the law is pretty tough: you need to think _every_ day this "Will I be able to pay anything I have to pay with a horizon of 12 months?"

If in one day answer is NO, you have to immediatelly go and register insolvency. If you do not do it, big issue, and possible jail time.

reply
upvoteby wagwang2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
That's what bank underwriting is for and you will quickly find that your 0 income 0 asset llc would have difficulty borrowing.
reply
upvoteby notanormalnerd4 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
Yeah, he has no clue and complains about having no clue.

He wants a company but not put down any assets, but still limited liability, he has to get a UG. But obviously customers don't want to deal with that because there are no assets in case they pay 5.000€ and the company goes belly up.

Customers deal with GmbH, because they know they have at least a little bit of value in assets. So if I buy from you for 5.000€ I know that should be covered by your assets.

The guy is an idiot and has been misconsulted by the law firm and has been pulled over the table by said law firm.

reply
upvoteby ekelsen3 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
That's not how it works in most other countries and it seems fine?
reply