upvote
Not quite. In the US this condition is handled at the back end. Running a corporation or LLC without sufficient capitalization can be grounds for piercing the liability shield in a lawsuit.
reply
> Running a corporation or LLC without sufficient capitalization can be grounds for piercing the liability shield in a lawsuit.

Which is exactly how it should be handled, IMO: Deal with the abuse situations directly.

Forcing new companies to capitalize with an arbitrary amount of money at time of founding penalizes small players who want to start a company. It's also not a hurdle at all for large players who want to commit large frauds.

reply
> penalizes small players who want to start a company

That's a barrier to entry; and who likes to perpetrate those? Why big, established companies who lobby the government.

reply
Is the gmbh pierce proof? Because then I like the situation where if you start with $25,000 under no circumstance can they get past the liability shield.
reply
Usually, yes. There are a few exceptions, such as serious misconduct, tax fraud and not declaring insolvency when necessary. But as long as you're following the law, you're fine.
reply
I have the impression the situations where that actually happens are at least arguably serious misconduct, and usually targeted at someone with significant assets.

A construction company that pockets ten million dollars and doesn't build anything probably can't shield its owner this way, but a single-developer software consultancy that pockets ten thousand dollars and delivers buggy code can.

reply
In theory it’s based on whether the owner of the company intended to run it under capitalized in an effort to shirk liability.
reply
But the larger point still stands: Limited liability was granted “on the front end” without the entity needing to demonstrate a minimum amount of capital. You’re only pointing out that in the U.S. that it’s possible that “on the back end” the owners of the entity might become personally liable.
reply
Yes, i’m just elaborating on OP’s point. The US system is different and basically more optimistic on the front end.
reply
deleted
reply
Much the same in the UK. Usually some kind of fraud or failing to stop trading when it was obvious insolvency was unavoidable. No minimum capital requirements either.
reply
Thats cause the software and computing industry early on, disclaimed all liability.

"Computers are hard, yo!". It devalues the profession.

And I thought no liability was bad enough... But no. Now its LLMs and " for entertainment purposes only". I take it management and leadership also read that, and don't give one fuck.

reply
The ability to build reliable software has existed for a long time. Commercial airlines make heavy use of it, and serious failures are vanishingly rare.

The problem is building software to those standards of reliability is expensive and slow. Consumer software never justifies it. Business software rarely does. If you want me to accept liability for the consequences of bugs in code I write, I'm giving you a schedule five times as long and a price twenty times as high.

reply
>Commercial airlines make heavy use of it, and serious failures are vanishingly rare.

Is this a joke? There's a major outage effecting flights at least yearly. The Delta one is from May...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Southwest_Airlines_schedu... [2] https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/airline-news/2026/05/0...

reply
The OP is talking about the software onboard airplanes, not the operational software used by airlines.

They should have said aircraft manufacturers, not airlines, but it’s clear what they meant.

reply
While extreme cases are the easiest to imagine, in real life the plaintiff almost always argues to pierce the veil and the defendant always argues the opposite, and both sides earnestly believe that they are right.
reply
And in real life piercing the veil is extremely exceptional
reply
It's so exceptional in the UK you can run a series of fraudulent businesses which are incorporated, "buy" services, don't pay for them, then declare themselves insolvent, rinse and repeat, and there's a fair chance you'll get away with it.

It's called phoenixing. There are good few bans for it every year, but almost no convictions for fraud.

reply
Not to mention all the fraud the Turkish barbers etc are up to
reply
Yeah but the veil doesn’t get pierced that’s super rare, which is more important than everyone’s emotional state.
reply
Not in the US it’s not. LLCs don’t shield your assets from personal negligence. So if you have a single member LLC with no employees (very common), an awful lot of what prompt a successful suit will be because of negligence on your part.
reply
Have to prove fraud to get there. "Under" capitalization is a judgment call. Effectively, it's very rare. An LLC launches with effectively zero dollars literally dozens of times a day.
reply
Haven't heard anything about LLC capitalization in this context. Liability shield can be pierced, but only if LLC is misused (i.e. "when the company is treated as a personal "alter ego" and used to commit fraud, injustice, or illegal acts"). Lack of capitalization is not one of the reasons as long as you treat it as a company, not your wallet.
reply
No there’s lots of reasons it can’t be pierced. It doesn’t shield you from liability that results from your own negligence, and for owner operator businesses that’s a large attack surface.
reply
This is a core difference between common law and civil law. In common law systems, things tend to get sorted out after the fact, with a judge's discretion, only if things go really wrong. In civil law systems they try to design a perfect system of laws that makes problems impossible.
reply
To clarify a point here, U.S. entrepreneurs (and unfortunately our union committees as well) find that sort of thing tolerable; the larger majority by an order of magnitude, U.S. consumers that aren’t currently (or planning to be) invested in a business, tend to be strongly opposed once they understand the outcomes.
reply
I set up an LLC in the US for about $500 and pay Delaware a few hundred each year in fees. As it turned out, it was probably an unnecessary exercise and I probably won't renew in a couple years. But it wasn't a big deal.
reply
Delaware is expensive and you must have had a very specific reason to build your LLC there, rather than for example in Wyoming - such that to raise capital, build a corporation, etc. Now if you want to shut it down in a couple of years, it's not exactly clear what you had in mind.
reply
If you register your company in WY but will be doing business in e.g. MA, you will have to pay registration fee in both jurisdictions. Doesn't sound like a saving to me.

If you mean why not register in your state, then Delaware has some tax benefits I believe. Not sure they will apply in MA though, maybe somewhere else?

reply
MA was going to be quite a bit more expensive. I did the transaction through Stripe and they use Delaware.
reply
deleted
reply
We have an UG for that. A GmbH is simply the wrong legal form for that sort of thing. You can create an UG with a single Euro on the bank account (and then immediately go bankrupt once you need to pay the notary).
reply
No we don't. UG is still a GmbH bureaucratic monster which a bit less start capital. You still need to follow all taxation rules like GmbH, which costs you few more thousands per year (Bilanzeirung, Steuerberater, Abschluss, ...) just to be legaly compliant.

American LLC taxation is as simple as or even simpler than Anlage EÜR. And you don't need a tax advisor to do it.

reply
That’s what they said? That UG solves the issue of having to have a start capital.
reply
> which a bit less start capital.

You may consider a capital stock of "at least 1€" even significantly less than 25k€. Not sure you are arguing in good faith.

reply
A UG and and a GmbH is legal-wise exactly the same.
reply
OP’s point is that you don’t need money in the bank to open an LLC like you would in Germany.
reply
You don't need money for the UG either. You might need money for operating expenses later etc, but that's not what OP complained about and should be similar for an LLC. (Depending on type of business, location etc)
reply
There's other types of companies. Like UG or freelancers or GbR.
reply
> sometimes shit happens and debts go unpaid

What’s wild is that this is pre-debt. The banks will have their own risk math for you so it’ll be a completely separate set of hoops before you get to be in debt as a company. Most will not even talk to you if you have 0€ in the business account. I don’t feel like a company with no assets or income can do that much damage to their societies.

Also as a small company in the EU I have to have liability insurance for the company for any major clients so the insurance company also will make you jump through further hoops.

reply
> I don’t feel like a company with no assets or income can do that much damage to their societies.

Keep in mind that those companies will almost always own some debit to their employees when they blow up.

IMO, $25k is a ridiculous amount of capital to require from a company before they can operate. But capital requirements are good, and they should be proportional to employment, not company existence.

reply
It seems anchored in the risks of the past vs the possibilities of today.
reply
There are ways to go into debt without dealing with banks. Any time you use something and are charged afterwards, it's a debt (which you could fail to pay by being broke by the time the invoice arrives). Common example - rent/lease. Or gas/electricity.
reply
Those vendors can always require payment in advance, or a guarantor.
reply
For a new business with $0 the individual running it will be the guarantor on those.
reply
deleted
reply
[flagged]
reply