That means they're not complying with the license terms. Which would be stealing. Like I said it would be.
replyCopyright violation is not theft. Your effort to create something that can be effortlessly copied conveys to you no property. Society deems it beneficial to grant a time limited monopoly on copying it to spur innovation.
replyYou wouldn’t steal a car!
replyBut I would download one.
replyStealing a car - or anything tangible - means... the owner is very literally deprived of the benefits of owning said car/thing. Can't really say the same for a copied pattern of bits.
replyThats not what you said. You said "copy the license terms". Copying a license isn't the same as complying with one.
replyThough it looks like in this case they didn't do either.
So we're in violent agreement then?
replyBrutally violent agreement. kicks shin, shakes hand
reply