upvote

points

by jimnotgym14 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby gorgoiler11 hours ago|
next
[-]
Some things in life happen for the very last time and we never realize it. Where were you when Jim Maxwell interrupted the test match coverage, for the final time, to declare that “listeners on long wave will now hear the shipp-ing four-cairst”? :)

With apologies to Affabeck Lauder

reply
upvoteby Peanuts9912 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
Digital radio was always going to be crap, it doesn't degrade gradually as signal gets worse They should have just put all the money into a better 4G network and ran radio through that.
reply
upvoteby cogman106 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
> it doesn't degrade gradually as signal gets worse

That has a lot more to do with the dated implementation and less to do with digital radio. There are a number of digital broadcasting techniques which can minimize and compensate for noise, including a slight delay with a signal correction and fault tolerant codecs.

DAB was implemented using the old MPEG2 audio codec. DAB+ uses the now 15 year old codec HE-AAC which isn't really designed to handle corruption. Opus handles loss a lot better (see their examples https://opus-codec.org/examples/ )

reply
upvoteby bestham3 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
> DAB was implemented using the old MPEG2 audio codec. No, it was MPEG 1 layer 2 often at 192 kbps. Later they switched to HE-AAC with DAB+.
reply
upvoteby dotwaffle2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
DAB+ uses EEP (and RS) which was deliberately chosen to give better signal quality all the way to the point of losing reception. Old DAB used UEP which degrades faster, but instead of having no signal, it went to a muddier / warbling kind of sound that characterised early DAB receivers.

And technically while some people do call it MPEG2, it's actually MP2, also known as MPEG-1 Audio Layer 2, an audio codec in the same family as MP3 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer 3).

I imagine that today they'd probably use something like Opus and a fountain code or similar, yes... But you can't expect everyone to replace their radio every 10-15 years ;)

reply
upvoteby cogman101 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
> I imagine that today they'd probably use something like Opus and a fountain code or similar, yes... But you can't expect everyone to replace their radio every 10-15 years ;)

Certainly not, which is why I believe DAB (no plus) is still floating around. And I'm not really suggesting that they made a bad choice.

I'm mostly pushing back on the notion that digital means all or nothing audio. If broadcast audio stays alive (which it may not) then I hope the next standard is opus, fountain codes, and QAM-64 or similar so we can stuff a bunch of bits into error correction while still having graceful degradation, better than analog, when the signal degrades.

reply
upvoteby dotwaffle1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
I could be wrong, but I think DAB uses DQPSK (which can be thought of as a special version of QAM 4 if you squint a bit) and not anything like the higher QAM constellations because it's deliberately designed for mobile (road, train etc) where you don't have a steady signal, it can vary a lot with motion, so QAM 64 wouldn't really be possible.

Though I did a quick check and apparently DRM+ uses QAM-16, so perhaps my knowledge is far too out of date :S

reply
upvoteby cogman101 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
LTE and 5g both use QAM 256 and higher. Wifi 7 can use QAM 4096 (though not a lot of motion there).
reply
upvoteby fredoralive10 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
Bit of hindsight bias there, DAB was first developed in the mid 1990s, ubiquitous fast wireless IP in everyone’s pockets is at least a decade, perhaps nearer to 20 years in the future. There are quite a few transitionary technologies that we needn’t have developed had we just waited for something better to come along (but without the R&D into some of them…).

(Also doesn’t analogue FM also kinda cut off fairly abruptly?)

reply
upvoteby mybrowsercache9 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
FM stays listenable even with heavy distortions when you drive out of range and you can decide for yourself when you no longer tolerate the signal. Digital doesn’t give you warnings and just goes silent
reply
upvoteby dingaling6 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
In my experience DAB goes painfully 'squawky' and squeaky before finally cutting out, it's unbearable in headphones.

This video gives a good example of the signal breaking down from 00:38

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-ihmXOy1h4

reply
upvoteby guenthert9 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
DAB+ receivers can (and many do) display signal quality. Not playing distorted, noisy signals is a feature I greatly appreciate.
reply
upvoteby hdgvhicv6 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
It’s a digital cliff. Analog fades away but is never a true replication digital remains stable for over but then vanishes.

At the same quality dab is still perfectly long after fm becomes gabled. It then vanishes.

The problem with dab in early days was the lower strength, the poor quality decoding, and the lower bitratr than should be been used for the codec.

reply
upvoteby dotwaffle2 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Not entirely true. There's quite a bit of error correction applied: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Audio_Broadcasting#Err...
reply
upvoteby hulitu6 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
> Not playing distorted, noisy signals is a feature I greatly appreciate

Haha. The DAB+ signals are compressed as much as possible.

reply
upvoteby guenthert6 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Some more than others. E.g. Deutschlandfunk Kultur is broadcasted in decent quality, as is NDR3. Klassik Radio fares poorer, but that's due to the bandwidth allocated to them.

Comparison here is FM, not FLAC.

reply
upvoteby gosub1003 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Especially so with digital public TV. its absolutely unusable. and now they can't stand that people want to share sports broadcasts, so they are updating it again to add encryption. I can't believe anyone watches it.
reply
upvoteby expedition3210 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
I have a DAB radio and it gets constant interference. Meanwhile FM is stable. In the same set up.

Really soured me on this digital radio technology.

reply
upvoteby jhoechtl25 minutes ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
They do its called 5G broadcast. No, this doesn't require point to point connections.
reply
upvoteby microgpt9 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
One-to-one communications and broadcast communications are different. Perhaps every 4G tower could broadcast the news on a special data channel, but it would be a separate system from the main 4G data channel.
reply
upvoteby arprocter2 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
Funny you mention the cricket

In the HBO miniseries Generation Kill the marines are tuned into the beeb long wave to get news updates, and there's a cricket score read out in the first episode

https://www.reddit.com/r/generationkill/comments/6o2w2s/epis...

reply
upvoteby Scoundreller13 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
A/The real reason was that electricity meters were built around a part of the signal being used to switch between price tiers but recently phased out.
reply