upvote
"Meanwhile in <location> we can't even have Flock cameras to automatically catch people who may have killed someone"

Hopefully the absurdity of broad scale surveillance can't be so easily lost in hyperbole

reply
Flock doesn't automatically catch people who killed someone. Red light cameras do catch people who run red lights.
reply
No one in law enforcement is trying to help you. That's not what it's for.
reply
And people that don't run red lights and suffer selective enforcement and are used for arbitrary surveillance and so on and so on. Don't let your naive view of what you want these things and their handlers to do distract you from reality, regardless of the brand or intent of widely deployed cameras.
reply
Traditional red light cameras take a still frame and are triggered only during a red light violation.
reply
That's actually a problem because sometimes they catch people who weren't running the red light, but easily fixed by capturing a bit more.
reply
Thank goodness you found a basic flaw in red light and speed enforcement cameras. It's shame it's taken decades for someone to realize this issue and now we can finally start working on solutions like taking two photos.
reply
Having been in Texas last month these cameras are all over your state. I saw them everywhere from the smallest city to houston

https://imgur.com/a/P7WxKpU

reply
Make sure you're not looking at traffic control cameras. These are used to monitor traffic for the traffic lights.
reply
They're all basically turned off by law, just not removed
reply
That is ridiculous. Some level of surveillance is necessary to bring the society closer to the optimal state.
reply
Honestly I like that policy. What's the legality of flock in Texas?
reply
Totally legal.

The operating theory of all of these cameras is that anything happening in public sight is by its nature not private. The federal government is dumping millions and millions of dollars into grant programs for municipalities to buy it… It’s a giant federal surveillance program disguised as decisions made by individual police departments.

It’s hilarious and depressing to contrast the HN community reaction to Snowden versus the mostly meh response to flock.

reply
The last 20 years has burned privacy into the ground for a large part of the population.
reply
The plain view doctrine dates back to the 70s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_view_doctrine
reply
[flagged]
reply
There's this insidious tendency among HNers to make this argument and ones like it.

Yeah, if you live in a tiny medieval village or a small town in the middle of nowhere in 1980 there was little "privacy" but Jeffrey Dahmer was fucking dudes (back when that wasn't ok) and eating people in his apartment for years before anyone caught on. In more suburban settings there truly was privacy to a large practical extent.

Furthermore, these argument lie through their teeth to portray privacy from those who you mostly voluntarily associate, vs privacy from government systems that can seek you out, have power over you and can fairly unilaterally screw you with little recourse and you cannot choose not to associate with.

Having people not associate with you in 1980, or 1280, because you did something sly or immoral is fundamentally different from being combed over by the government because you hit some unknowable proprietary criteria that triggered them to go over you with a fine tooth comb.

reply
Have you ever seen "Wings of Desire" (der Himmel über Berlin)? for anyone who's paranoid about "surveillance states" it's an eye-opener, about how things really work: about how overseers and spiritual beings really may perceive human activity, and if you really think about it, perhaps there is good that can come from this.

There's this insidious HN tendency to believe that "The Government" (whatever that means) is 100% malicious and Out To Get Us. The reality is far more nuanced, my friend. if "The Government" was truly out to get so many people, they would get them, and society wouldn't actually functoin. "The Government" wants people to work, and raise children and stimulate the economy; The Government likes when people are abled and working/supporting others, and paying taxes, and HNers seem to think "The Government" wants to perpetually interfere and intervene and trip us up. Just reading HN and /. and the other paranoia boards, I'd think that there are swat teams on every corner and black helicopters pouncing on every third hacker on a weekly basis, man.

The crazy thing is that this administration in the USA is gutting governmental apparatus, makign a "small government" and "drainining the swamp" that leftists love to hate on, but honestly a "smaller government" definitely for sure won't have enough ability to screw with the common man like y'all believe it would.

Sure, gov't can privatize a lot of stuff like handing over to Flock, but still, Flock's aligned with them, and (see Wings of Desire again) this is not malice and not naked malevolence. Sorry.

reply
You're mistaken if you think the community is still the same percentage of humans.
reply
That’s a fair point that I didn’t consider, thank you.
reply
What meh response? There has been a continued and very vocal response against flock here.
reply
If you pointed out any of the many problematic aspects of Snowden in those days, you’d be shouted down and voted into oblivion immediately.
reply
Good, because nothing “problematic” about an individual matters one bit when presented with nefarious government activities. It’s obvious distraction technique 101.
reply