It is not really the same as LLMs. I wouldn't call it AI. And I wouldn't say "makes up". I work in this field and this is certainly based also in part on my research.
reply‘Makes up’ is inaccurate for sure. But it’s not strictly true to call it acquired data either.
replyAfter years of collecting artifacts and errors, I have more and more respect for the tool.
But it’s jarring. I open a sequence, decrease the acquired resolution, add the AI and get a scan that’s quicker and higher resolution.
It’s an amazing time to be an MR tech.
It is amazing. It is the result of two decades of research in image reconstruction algorithms. The machine learning is part of it, but that it is sold as "AI" has probably more to do with marketing.
replyIt's just DLSS/Frame Generation for MRI's.
reply