upvote
> The majority of people to be remigrated if the party succeeds are not even citizens.

And what of the ones who are citizens?

reply
[flagged]
reply
Trivia: there is a country in America where people can be stripped of their nationality for "treason", which amounts to go agaisnt the government. This means people can be left without civil rights, and can't enter the country if they were abroad.

All born inside the country, born from both national parents or naturalized are elegible. This year they declared acquiring the nationality of another country also made you elegible to be barren from their native country.

Nicaragua is really something weird, but all humans are capable of dehumanizing other people.

reply
Why only the naturalized ones?
reply
Stripping of naturalization in the US is usually associated with immigration fraud.

Terrorist/Nazi Concentration Camp Guard lies on immigration forms, decades later is found out and gets the boot

reply
> The majority of people to be remigrated if the party succeeds are not even citizens

The fact that people can say this without immediately noticing the problem is absolutely mind-blowing.

reply
They know the problem. Never believe, even for a minute, that right wingers are unaware of the depravity of the things they say. They just want to pretend that it’s not a problem. And indeed you can see in their reply - they love the idea of a two tiered society where some people can be stripped of citizenship and rights arbitrarily.
reply
Because those people never should have received citizenship to begin with. The asylum system have been abused to no end. To get to Sweden you have to pass trough many many stable countries in which there is no war. Beggars can't be choosers, so if they are choosers and want the good stuff - they are not real beggars.

Look how the Gulf states deal with citizenship and they manage to control much bigger immigrant relative to the native populations.

The only real refugees in Europe are Ukrainians.

reply
> Look how the Gulf states deal with citizenship and they manage to control much bigger immigrant relative to the native populations.

The gulf states, really? Why am I not surprised that you point to one of the largest modern day slave states as an example. I will not grant you the assumption of ignorance. For anyone else following this conversation, ReptileMan here is pointing to this system - https://www.humanrightsresearch.org/post/modern-day-slavery-... - one widely recognized as slavery - as an example of a good way to control large immigrant populations.

reply
In which city will you feel safer walking at night in the heavy migrant underclass areas - dubai or stockholm?
reply
I'm queer, you racist dipshit. It's illegal for me to even exist in Dubai.

Even without that, I keep my head on a swivel in any lower income areas - migrant or otherwise. It will shock you to learn this, but crime is not a phenomenon that is unique to brown people.

reply
If the gulf states are your north star, then you are straightforwardly advocating for a return of systemic wage theft, indentured servitude and slavery, all under threat of execution.

Which of those do you most prefer?

Would you also like an ethnic caste system, or should it be based solely on national origin, or a combination?

Or perhaps the original European model, where only non-christians may be enslaved?

reply