But ... the alternative is that the government actually pays a bit of money to fix the situation! To support their solutions. To actually develop them for enough devices. To secure them ... Plus the services the government made are way more invasive than the Google/Apple ones.
replyIn addition to the money, actually using them would be hundreds of times more complex, and they don't have the provisions Google has, for example accessibility and security services (like actually stopping people stealing accounts on a large scale). All of this can be done, easily even, but it isn't. Politicians don't want to.
https://www.itsme-id.com/business/platform/identification
https://france-identite.gouv.fr/
https://english.rekenkamer.nl/latest/news/2023/03/29/digital...
I just dont buy the argument that it would be that expensive for the governments to provide certified keychain fobs that provide hardware based identification.
replyThat was an option for the past 15+ tears at least in some EU countries. Its just not very convenient (garbage tier software they bought didn’t help either).
replyIt's pretty expensive to deal with all of the technical support and identity verification work when people lose their devices and need to have credentials reset.
replyIt's even more expensive to have your country's digital ID held hostage by the US or its big tech players.
replyHow do the apps bootstrap identity? Do they just use Apple/google (that seems really bad), or do they have you do some verification and input a token into the app somehow?
replyor, not force people into mandatory digital ID wallets at all.
replyIt doesn't force them to, strictly speaking - they also have the choice to sue the government
reply