upvote
Their target market is completely different. Anthropic and OpenAI try to build general AI that wins on all the benchmarks by throwing ungodly amounts of money at it.

Mistral focuses on long term b2b contracts and their proposition is that they fine tune their model to your needs with an added bonus of 'not dependent on America' in a politically tumultuous time.

reply
Another added bonus is that they offer a clear "self hosted" if you want it, you can get the exact same product without sending your queries to them, it's costlier and you need the hardware sure, but between the economic espionnage aspect, the sovereignty aspect, the data safety aspect ... This has teeth in europe.
reply
An so like if a business wanted to home in on one very specific use case that could be hyper optimized by SFT, had really good support for updating and adding new features, on-Prem etc. that’s the kind of market they are in?
reply
Lack of capital and (probably) lack of willingness to mass distill Anthropic and OpenAI.
reply
What would happen if they mass distilled one of the really large local models like GLM 700b or deepseek 1.6t?
reply
At that point you might as well just host them yourself.
reply
Those already exist.
reply
That's not how the innovation works
reply
Innovation is a pretty neutral concept. It doesn’t care about things like “what if my model learns from other models” as opposed to “what if my model learns from data I painfully curated” if the model progresses the same.
reply
Innovation is teaching your model on stolen data from literally everywhere but other models.
reply
Most probably lack of capital and talent. At the end of the day they have to compete with other giants for the chips to train the models.
reply
I wouldn't be surprised if they had new models up their sleeve. Could be wrong of course.
reply
I’m pretty sure they have new models, but not better ones
reply
capital and talent is the same in this context

there's no shortage of talent in Europe or France, it's just an issue of available capital

reply
What I meant was top talent. US is still the top destination for top AI talent in general
reply
A large contingent of the top AI people is French, the Mistral founders worked at Meta and Google before coming back to France. The real issue is capital, French salaries are shit
reply
"there's no shortage of talent in Europe or France, it's just an issue of available capital"

This is more complicated than you paint it. Countries like UAE have enough capital to throw at things and little-to-no taxation, yet they don't attract as much talent as they would like to.

Preexisting centers of excellence like Silicon Valley are attractive for young talented people precisely because a lot of older talented people are already there. The same reason why a young talented painter in 15th century would prefer Florence to some rich, but boring place elsewhere.

You can only really do a meaningful work in a "heavy" field by tightly cooperating with others, and physical proximity still matters.

reply