undefined

points

[-]

> > “It seems that ending new sales of Hide My Email until the problem is fixed would be an effective way to limit the number of customers at risk. Is that an option?” Murphy wrote back.

> I can only hope that was a sardonic moment of frustration quoted out of context

I didn't make my point clearly there, and I think it makes more sense in context, but it was a sincere suggestion that Apple could stop allowing new people to use Hide My Email. There are many other email aliasing services, so they wouldn't be depriving people of a unique offering. At the time, I wasn't aware that Hide My Email was only available as part of iCloud+. All I knew was that it wasn't free.

by alwa9 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

Makes sense to me! I'd gone off the 404 Media article originally linked. The way you put it in your blog timeline (now the link of record) makes perfect sense to me:

> We hope that Apple will take steps to limit the attack surface area even before the vulnerability is fixed. Disabling creation of new Hide My Email addresses could be helpful. It also seems responsible to notify all Hide My Email users of the risk.

Thank you for your work, and your persistence against our Sphinx-like overlords!