In other words, AI code is owned by nobody.
replyAI code is owned by owners and society is figuring out in real-time if code has some inherent value without humans that understand it.
replyI'll be really interested to follow what comes out of the Bun team.
It's not innacurate to say that AI code becomes legacy code the instant it's merged.
replyTragedy of the commons
replyYep, without a decent team culture this is what LLMs force, the slop deluge is just overwhelming without leadership asserting "no, stop"
replyUltimately you just let bugs through because the alternative is spend an inordinate amount of time communicating with someones claude through PR comments about what the shape should be.
Career was fun while it lasted. I suppose its a blessing a to get to do a job that you enjoyed for as many years as I did.
Disapprove and ask for a call where the author must verbally explain the changes to receive approval? This seems like a solvable problem, and one that already existed in repos with many contributors of varying skill (open source, bigco with lots of interns). Letting bugs through is an even bigger time sink.
replyIf you work at a small shop that may work. Everyone is 100xer now thanks to AI. No one has time to actually go through all this nonsense, not even the people who "wrote" it. Approve and pray you're not the one on call is the only viable strategy for some.
reply