upvote
It's clear you haven't engaged with the subject matter beyond the typical "internet-forum cynic" mindset.

Both companies were founded on the basis of AI Safety.

- There are tons of great safety people doing real work at OpenAI. Releases are held back, models are evaluated, etc.

- Anthropic goes even further - constrained themselves with a PBC/LTBT structure, treat safety even more rigorously, and notably delayed the release of Mythos (literally the opposite of what you alleged) and continue to hold their two red lines despite threats from the gov.

You should actually talk to some of the people at these labs. Nearly everyone working at these places genuinely believe AGI/ASI is actually happening, so they do take safety seriously.

To imply these companies don't care about safety is typical internet-brand nihilism/cynicism that helps you feel smart while being literally the opposite of the truth.

reply
To add to this, they should look at the Fable system card. It's 317 pages and it's clear how serious they are taking AI safety.
reply
Page count is not a measure of how seriously something is being taken when you can easily generate pages and pages of slop
reply
There is no reason for you to make personal attacks like that. Not on HN.

Moreover, your take on Dario is over simplistic, and undersells the extent to which Anthropic takes seriously safety. It's not lip service, there are real dollars and attention spent on alignment at Anthropic.

reply