undefined

points

[-]

Would be interested in seeing your sources for this. I've yet to see evidence that this has the significant upsides that would, definitely not justify, but at least explain, the push towards limiting fundamental freedoms.

There's a reason "who will think of the children" is ridiculed: there's no evidence that this is the intent or that there are outcomes. Everything I've read to date shows that surveillance is not effective in curbing CSAM, that the people (and especially organised crime) that engage into such activity are not using plain text and twitter to talk to each other, that those solutions that are known to have outcomes are not being invested in or enforced, etc.

by jasonvorhe2 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

If any of this was about protecting children, that Epstein thing wouldn't have been buried and forgotten already.

by embedding-shape1 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

The whole Epstein sage is very closely tied to the current US administration, I haven't seen much of it being tied to anything about the EU Council. I think you might confuse the government ties Epstein had, at least the ones we knew about.

by Yokolos1 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

You think the European wealthy are innocent of pedophilia? What about Prince Andrew? This goes far beyond just the current US administration.

by embedding-shape1 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

> You think the European wealthy are innocent of pedophilia?

You think children should be executed in the streets? Neither of us said any such thing, why ask that as a question even?

My only point being that Epstein himself doesn't seem related to EU Council, based on facts, while he was very close friend of the current sitting US president, and the whole thing is still being actively swept under the rug by the US Justice Department. Two governments located on two different continents...