upvote

points

by embedding-shape1 days ago |
comments
upvoteby tgv1 days ago|
next
[-]
> Don't look at what your marketing/landing page does first

True. Also: the landing page and all the other corporate boasting are often run by a marketeer or similar, who knows nothing about the technical part. They just have a design, and outsource implementation. So it just ends up somewhere.

reply
upvoteby neya1 days ago|
prev|
next
[-]
> Dammit, fell for another AI slop article AGAIN...

Is it really "slop" if you keep falling for AI written articles again and again? Doesn't that actually mean the opposite - the AI seemingly convinced you (or almost) that it was written by a realy human?

reply
upvoteby snackbroken1 days ago|
parent|
next
[-]
LLM text is like an optical illusion for the language part of your brain, only instead of the payoff being "Oh, cool! The dots aren't actually moving!" it's "Oh, 'cool'. You weren't actually trying to tell me anything worth my time."
reply
upvoteby embedding-shape1 days ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
Yes, because it sounds reasonable at the beginning, then the further you go, the less sense it makes. Ultimately you look up the stuff that felt weird initially, and found the reason why it sounded so weird.

If I never actually noticed it, it wouldn't be slop, that I'd agree with. But in this case, I did notice, so it is slop.

reply
upvoteby jurgenburgen1 days ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
They pointed out that the article is suggesting a completely wrong solution.

If the article was written by a human it would be valuable feedback for the author. Because the article was written by a LLM it was just the commenter being tricked to be engaged by generated noise.

reply
upvoteby rrr_oh_man1 days ago|
prev|
[-]
> Dammit, fell for another AI slop article AGAIN...

Yes, it's INFURIATING. I hate, hate, hate this. :(

Can we start flagging shit like this, please?

reply
upvoteby cindyllm1 days ago|
parent|
[-]
[dead]
reply