Chalmers is stating that there's more demand for philosophers with the right sort of training to work at AI companies (whatever that is) than there are philosophers with that training. (I don't really believe this, but that's what he says.)
He's making this claim for two reasons: (1) to respond to the argument (not directly stated in the article, but quite commonly understood to be sound in the profession field) that it's unwise to get a PhD in philosophy because there are not enough jobs and (2) to suggest that if you do want to get a PhD in philosophy and use it professionally, you'd be wise to study with Chalmers at NYU in order to get placed into these tech-industry jobs.
Imagine knowing that you're hired to launder regulatory capture for a trillion dollar corporation lol
I'm neither and am labelled left wing because I think everyone deserves some basic level of life and dignity.
I imagine you'd find more than average, actually. You have a front-row seat to how the sausage is made.
when in school i hung out with a lot of architecture students. They were all told and taught that they will be the next Frank Lloyd Wright or a failure. Then they graduate and end up getting a job drawing construction documents for Taco Bell. Heh they're a pretty jaded bunch.
The irony
That's the in-house style for the WSJ
FWIW I think the WSJ is the best news source available and does not match this description.