upvote
What you're missing is that this is approximately at least a half-dozen more jobs than open tenure-track positions at research universities.
reply
Wouldn't the correct comparison would be filled positions tenure and tenure-track positions?
reply
The implicit assumption is that these AI-company jobs were recently created and indicate the start of a trend.

Chalmers is stating that there's more demand for philosophers with the right sort of training to work at AI companies (whatever that is) than there are philosophers with that training. (I don't really believe this, but that's what he says.)

He's making this claim for two reasons: (1) to respond to the argument (not directly stated in the article, but quite commonly understood to be sound in the profession field) that it's unwise to get a PhD in philosophy because there are not enough jobs and (2) to suggest that if you do want to get a PhD in philosophy and use it professionally, you'd be wise to study with Chalmers at NYU in order to get placed into these tech-industry jobs.

reply
Wow, it is hard not to immediately think of that meme. There are indeed dozens of them!
reply
Half-dozens of them, apparently.
reply
more than half a dozen, probably, so safe to say there could be as much as ten.
reply
Can earth's population fill that demand?
reply
> each of which employs at least a half-dozen philosophers.

Imagine knowing that you're hired to launder regulatory capture for a trillion dollar corporation lol

reply
Imagine explaining Nietzsche's relationship with his sister to an AI. :/
reply
That reminds me of a survey that found that in the entire field of Social Psychology, there was something like eight people that indicated they would vote for Romney over Obama.
reply
Well yeah rightwing people are not the kind of people to take up psychology. I also don’t think you will find many Marxists in corporate law .
reply
Romney was even pretty centrist, to the point that Obamacare was based on Romney's plan. A similar analogy would be if only a half dozen employees in some field were willing to vote for Fetterman.
reply
I suppose that makes sense if you assume that people who aren't right wing must be Marxist.

I'm neither and am labelled left wing because I think everyone deserves some basic level of life and dignity.

reply
At this point I wouldn't consider Romney "rightwing", more of a centrist by current standards. Heck, the president probably thinks Romney is a socialist.
reply
> I also don’t think you will find many Marxists in corporate law .

I imagine you'd find more than average, actually. You have a front-row seat to how the sausage is made.

reply
[dead]
reply
The revenge of the _nearly a dozen_ philosophers.
reply
Hey now, that might be infinite% growth compared to just a couple of years ago!
reply
Those are dining philosophers!
reply
Philosophy majors. That piece of paper does not make you a philosopher.
reply
Bit of a tangent, but it's fun to think about how much it takes to become a -er, -ian or -ist in a given field. Philosophy is probably one of the hardest, you need to be seen as up there with the all-time greats. In history or physics you probably need to be faculty, in economics you need to have a PhD, in engineering you don't even need a degree but you need to be practicing,...
reply
> you need to be seen as up there with the all-time greats

when in school i hung out with a lot of architecture students. They were all told and taught that they will be the next Frank Lloyd Wright or a failure. Then they graduate and end up getting a job drawing construction documents for Taco Bell. Heh they're a pretty jaded bunch.

reply
Still an “architect” though.
reply
Reminds me of section 211 in Beyond Good and Evil (and all of part 6, for that matter)
reply
Someone did quote me on bash.org once as having said: Wanting a man who doesn't smell is like wanting a woman who doesn't talk.
reply
The title of the article is misleading -- they're pretty clearly talking about philosophy PhDs here.
reply
By my personal standards for the term, the majority of philosophers don't have PhDs and the vast majority of philosophy PhDs are not philosophers.
reply
There was another article on this recently[1], if I didn't know better I would suspect this narrative is being pushed by some PR firm. Maybe it's coming from AI companies trying to imply their models are so advanced that they need philosophers to determine if they're conscious or something?

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662452

reply
> a prominent philosopher of consciousness at N.Y.U., observes…

The irony

reply
> This article seems high on vibes, low on metrics.

That's the in-house style for the WSJ

reply
Not sure if it changed but this is written by NYTimes.

FWIW I think the WSJ is the best news source available and does not match this description.

reply
Agree 100%
reply
[dead]
reply