Can you give examples of what you consider "nasty attitude" on their part? All criticism of other project I've seen was either cold, clinical technical criticism, or defense against slander propagated in the media against GrapheneOS.
replyI haven't seen GrapheneOS folks going out of their way to attack anyone.
[flagged]
replyCould you please share some examples?
replyI often see them being on point and highlighting important details. Majority of custom roms aren't taking security seriously, so I don't think there's anything wrong with calling them out on that.
[flagged]
replyI find it to be pretty reasonable, and also consistent with what GrapheneOS previously said. They were consistently against company-owned verification. I don't see anything offensive here: they aren't attacking individuals or projects, but rather attacking an approach that is harmful.
replyThat's because Unified Attestation is unsalvageable. It's basically the same scam as Google's, with different owners doing (or wanting to do) the extortion.
reply[flagged]
reply[flagged]
reply