upvote
> And those people won't need to be software engineers....You've implicitly assumed here that the AI systems will always be worse than the average engineer.

Most of what we do as engineers is precisely describe or analyze the behavior we want or the behavior we don't want. All other engineering skills that are useful are ultimately downstream from understanding the behavior of software enough to know which parts to keep, improve, or jettison. Chatbots can take care, somewhat, of analysis or expansion of instructions.... but they can't read minds. I don't see that changing any time soon.

reply
> but they can't read minds

I don't know who needs to hear this, but neither can humans.

You've implicitly assumed here that AI systems will always be worse at contextualizing and framing questions than the average engineer. I'm not sure that it's even true now let alone in the nebulous future.

You haven't narrowed the fundamental myopia of the assumption here, just dressed it in slightly different clothing.

reply
> You've implicitly assumed here that AI systems will always be worse at contextualizing and framing questions than the average engineer.

How would they know what to ask or contextualize if they don't know what the user wants?

reply
By asking the user to explain what they want whenever there's ambiguity.

Plus all the other things that software engineers generally have not learned to a professional level even if they picked up the basics on the job by osmosis, because figuring out the customer's needs (and what they'll pay you for which may be different) is the job of a business analyst, a PM, or a UX researcher, and those are different skills and two of them may come with a Business Informatics degree rather than a CompSci one.

LLMs can be "eh, better than nothing" at many things, not just code.

reply
And when an LLM runs up costs for a small company by getting them to lease a bunch of infrastructure they don't need, who can they sue? A contractor or advisor you can't hold liable is just a liability.
reply
Same person they'd sue if they used any other power tool themselves and it didn't work out right.

Plus, this is software "Engineering" we're talking about, which famously gets scare quotes in comparison to all the other forms of engineering because unlike them we don't have as standard things like professional liability insurance to cover serious professional errors of judgment the way someone who signs off on a bridge that collapses would have.

reply
Are you suggesting that psychic mindreading powers are real?

> How would they know

How would you? The answer is the same.

reply
I don't understand what you mean. I can't build software I can't describe.

If you're implying chatbots can ask their "client" what to build, good luck with that—contractors are at least liable for what they produce and have extreme incentives to ensure that their clients are happy. To the extent of refusing to build anything if they don't know what they want....

reply
deleted
reply