You can use Codex with any endpoint compatible with OpenAI Response API[1], like llama.cpp.
replyFWIW Claude Code works with OpenRouter so you can use any model.
replyCC system prompt is bloated, use Pi to test Codex instead
replyCodex is open source and lets you use any model https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/config-file/config-advanced#o...
replyOnly its CLI is open source. The desktop app is always proprietary.
replyCodex CLI is open source too. I don't think there is a difference.
replyCan't use a claude code subscription in another harness though
replyYou can however for now use wrappers which are not harnesses such as T3Code though. They were going to cut under the Programmatic API, but have at least temporarily walked it back.
replyDon't use providers that don't allow it.
replyYou absolutely can; they are not banning anymore. The bigger problem is that subscription versions of the models are way crappier than when the "same" model is hit via API (Bedrock/Vertex)
replyYou can also make it not count against extra usage.
OpenCode docs show it because Anthropic specifically ambushed them with a PR to remove support so simpletons can't use it easily.
The opencode docs[0] still say otherwise, do you have a source?
replyI am curious about the claim that the subscription models are different. Has anyone benchmarked this?
replymaybe he meant about server-side features? otherwise its dumb. OAI and Anthropic are using azure/aws/gcp...
replyHow does that work? Doesn't that mean Microsoft/Amazon/Google have full de facto access to OAI's and Anthropic's model weights and operational processes?
replyThis is one reason it surprised me that Anthropic decided to run stuff on Musk's hardware. It seems overwhelmingly likely that the new Grok release is informed by what Musk has been able to learn from that relationship.
This is not at all aligned with my experience. Do you have a source for this?
replydeleted
replyThey aren't banning it anymore, they just make it count as "extra usage". e.g. you're paying for every token in addition to your subscription.
replyFurther, the claim that the subscription "version" of the model is worse sounds like bullshit (and the sort of anecdotal nonsense that you see on sites like this). Do you have anything substantiating this?