> its hard to evaluate how much trust can be put in a project of this complexity at this early stage.
replyI don't know, I'm not finding it hard to evaluate that at all.
I've had bad enough experiences with gevent in the (now fairly distant) past, and that's a well-established project, just a subtle one with a large blast radius. This has all of those problems, plus is _much_ larger and I don't think can possibly have been tested as widely as I would want. I get maybe there's a lot of test code, but I think this kind of thing you only really know when the rubber meets the road.
250k lines of code in one commit is reason enough to disregard the project entirely, IMO. Vibe code if one wants, but that is just madness...
replyIt's pretty obvious that the author didn't write a single commit during development, they just squashed their commits into a single commit at the end.
replyWhether they did that or had an LLM one shot it, I dont really care. Commit history is pretty important if you ever want to try fixing bugs or improving features in the future.
reply