upvote

points

by darth_avocado16 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby Ray205 hours ago|
next
[-]
> would be 10% of the total income, which at those income levels, would never be a priority.

People vastly underestimate the subjective importance of the Internet for people. 10-20% of the total income seems like a very realistic figure, even if it means spending some days hungry.

reply
upvoteby darth_avocado3 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
People struggling for food, water, medicine, shelter will not in any world spend 10% of their income on internet. Thinking that they will is out of touch with reality and would only be a valid chain of thought when you’ve not seen what real poverty looks like.
reply
upvoteby notahacker3 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
People vastly overestimate the subjective importance of the internet if they think people with relatively little historic exposure to and practical use for the internet would rather go hungry or have a worse marriage for their daughter to replace the erratic internet connection on their phone and cybercafe use with a high speed broadband connection in their house...
reply
upvoteby inglor_cz12 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
When I was a teenager in early post-Communist Czechia, Internet connection was also expensive. So what we did was that we pooled resources. Five or ten households had a common connection and shared it.

I don't doubt that similar schemes will be used in Africa or India.

BTW Median income in India is about $3K a year.

reply
upvoteby darth_avocado2 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
> BTW Median income in India is about $3K a year

I explicitly mentioned income per person. This is household income, which obviously will be higher than individual income.

And as far as connection pooling goes, India already has 88% 4G and 80% 5G coverage in the villages. Far cheaper connections are already available that are already being leveraged in a way that you describe. The market where Starlink is appealing is much smaller.

reply
upvoteby laughing_man11 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
That's exactly what's happening. Entire villages are sharing one connection.
reply
upvoteby yxhuvud10 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
That is great, but it also sets the stage for actual fiber to be drawn as it is vastly cheaper to connect to an existing end user network than to build it up from scratch. When a critical mass of villages have built internal networks it will be worth drawing cable for them as well.

Lack of sufficient population density and political instability is what would stop this.

reply