upvote
Your parent comment isn’t saying they doubt the assertion, they’re asking for details.

If you say you know for certain, it makes sense to ask how. It makes a big difference if the answer is “I used to work there”, or “I implemented those systems myself”, or “I heard my cousin’s second ex-wife say she heard it from her hairdresser”, or “aliens visited me in my dreams and told me”.

I don’t doubt these companies are lying through their teeth. We have plenty of proof of several cases where they did, to the point believing they are liars is a sensible default, but still I could not say I know for certain of every instance of their lies. Knowing how empowers you to do something about it and convince others.

reply
No one is going to admit to having an inside source on HackerNews. Read between the lines.
reply
> No one is going to admit to having an inside source on HackerNews.

Not only is that not true (people make throwaway accounts specifically to share insider info), no one has said this was insider information, there are plenty of other ways to know these details.

> Read between the lines.

That means nothing. There’s no information given, there’s nothing to read between.

reply