upvote
The guy in charge of it has demonstrated that he'll cut people off from accessing it on a whim, though, so it's not really cheap and easy access for the entire globe. It's access for the selected people.
reply
It came on a whim and you didn't complain about that.

You get what you pay for and the service got paid for ultimately.

If it was important enough, it would have been paid for.

reply
They also have cut off people who paid, though. It's currently being paid for and had another cutoff for Ukraine in early February.
reply
Early February 2026 was at the directive of the Ukrainian government in response to hostile Russian use.

Please just stop this thing you're doing. It's nakedly markedly dishonest

reply
I understand that you want Russia to have access to it without interruption but until there is some sort of "International law" regarding those newer ways of providing Internet, politics will win.
reply
Doesn't that hold for all internet providers? I'm not familiar with SpaceX cutting people of, but that doesn't sound out of line compared to industry.
reply
Other Internet providers at least have true boards of directors, shareholders with decision power, etc. One person doesn’t have the power to snap their fingers and make decisions based on how much ketamine they’re on at the time.
reply
I'm sorry that I don't agree with you that a out of touch board of directors or shareholders are better from the get go than Musk.
reply
Killing Russian access was good, no?
reply
Almost all of us already have that, and the rest can as well.

The problem is not 'space' - it's getting ourselves sufficiently organized.

reply
The brief history of the internet suggests to me that this is not a clear win.
reply
It's already pretty cheap, global and universally available.
reply