upvote
> The temperature at the focal point may reach 3,500 °C

I thought this was interesting because it doesn’t really seem like an applicable top level claim, surely this is referring to a specific furnace, not all solar furnaces?

Then this got me thinking if there is some universal upper bound constraint to these temperatures. E.g. if I recall a telescope can’t make a source object brighter than it actually is, and this just seems like a thermal telescope, so I wonder if that principle applies here or not.

reply
> I wonder if that principle applies here or not

It applies, but also in practice the maximum temperature is lower than the theoretical upper bound.

https://what-if.xkcd.com/145/

reply
Oh funny, my intuition when I was writing that was “there’s probably an xkcd what if about this”, but I imagined it be about surrounding the sun with mirrors. Same idea though in the end
reply
You may have been thinking of this one instead https://what-if.xkcd.com/141/ . Maybe we should put Randall on the supervillain watchlist.
reply
Probably easier to use a MASER
reply
Unlike for light, in the microwave frequency domain it is easy to make very powerful microwave sources by other means than by using masers, i.e. with various kinds of vacuum tubes.

Masers are not useful as powerful transmitters, but only as amplifiers with a very low noise or as generators with a very stable frequency.

reply
You can't focus sunlight at the satellite distances. And this is a fundamental problem, the focal distance varies for each wavelength so your focus point will be smeared. You need monochromatic light for that (a laser).

Edit: and also don't forget that the Sun is not a point source and has an appreciable angular size, further making it impossible to focus it with a reasonably-sized lens or mirror.

reply
007: Die Another Day has it as a main plot point.
reply