> and no different than copy and paste from stack overflow
replyThis isn't really the point of your comment, and for that I apologise, but: not all of us did that. For many good reasons, too.
Yeah, the more I hear about people writing "boilerplate" or "copy pasting" code faster using LLMs the more I think it's mainly a tool for letting you write brittle, buggy code, faster.
reply>architecture design and LLM just exposes how bad people are at designing dynamic architectures
replySpeak for yourself. A lot of people have great abilities at designing "dynamic architectures" and anything else an LLM is used for. It sounds like you don't realize that an LLM is only capable of what it does because it was trained on human-written code.
> ... and no different than copy and paste from stack overflow.
replyIt's even got a name: sloppy-pasta.
I'm not sure this is a good combination?
replyI mean you're basically saying it is a good thing if the LLM messes up so you have a reason to debug the code.