This is naïve. The US government is less democratic than advertised, and there are many factors for that. Not going to write a tome, but if you're going to point a finger at one group, it shouldn't be private citizens.
replyThis is a common coping mechanism, but the US is quite democratic and almost any objection you have about corporate control or whatnot can be easily overridden by getting like 100,000 more people to agree with you.
reply>Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence.
replyhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-poli...
especially note figure 1.
Can you explain here without an LLM?
replyReally curious to hear more about this
Unless all of congress is included in that 100k, I’d love to hear a plausible scenario where this is actually achievable and not merely some clever edge case you found
Im not sure I agree that a two party system for 400 million people allows us to choose what our taxes are spent on.
replyIt does exactly that.
replyIt would be a mistake to assume that people who don’t agree with you are really dumb.
replyNo, no, almost everyone is really dumb, including the people who do agree with me.
replyTrue sometimes, but not always. It's unlikely dumb people are equally split between political parties.
reply