upvote
Maybe we should protect the children and then they couldn't use the excuse
reply
The scope of the things we already do to "protect the children" is tremendous. None of them have, will, or could prevent them from continuing to use it as an excuse for things that should never be done.
reply
their parents won't protect them and everyone else has to pay for it. maybe they shouldn't have been allowed to have kids.
reply
Nothing could possibly go wrong with eugenics
reply
The Idiocracy scenario we've stepped into isn't much better...
reply
It is. It's far from good, but it's much better than eugenics.
reply
Note that we do have a system of eugenics, which we call money.
reply
> Seriously, there is something tremendously wrong with governance when politicians keep changing the whole world around us, without us having any say in it at all.

That's where you're wrong. Most people actually do agree with age verification. Just because a decision is stupid it doesn't mean it's undemocratic. Trump was elected democratically, twice. Brexit passed through a referendum.

reply
Most people are in favor of solving world hunger, poverty, the wars and climate change. Until you hand them the bill. Likewise most people will not agree with age verification when actually implemented.
reply
It requires reason to understand the consequences of your decisions. Reason is something democracies have a shortage of. Thus, democracies structurally suffer from issues like this.
reply
It worked great for the last several hundred years. The problem is that as government keeps expanding to control more and more of our lives, every decision it makes it necessarily imposes on everyone, whether they agree with that decision or not.

E.g. In a country of 100M people, if 60% agree with a bill and it becomes law, the country has imposed that law on 40M people against their will. That's just as true in a dictatorship as it is in a democracy. The more areas of our lives government involves itself in, the bigger this problem becomes.

reply
> It worked great for the last several hundred years.

No, it did not.

> E.g. In a country of 100M people, if 60% agree with a bill and it becomes law

That's not how that law was adopted.

reply
Maybe it depends on how you frame it.

> Social media is destroying children's brains! Do you want access to be delayed until a certain age?

> Do you want children under a certain age to be banned from social media, which means that you will now have to give your ID, only with Android or iOS?

reply
> only with Android or iOS

99% of people understand this as "you need a smartphone" which is not a problem in 2026, even for the elderly.

reply
"only if you choose to share your personal data with either Google or Apple"?
reply
How is that different from having a banking app installed? Or a government ID app?
reply
I have neither. Phones are too much of a security liability to be linked into such sensitive realms of personal life.
reply
What you can do with the ID app, you can also do on paper (if not with a Web service), except "age verification".
reply
You can survive and be exist in society without both.
reply
Luckily, the EU's current structure was put to a referendum. That referendum then failed to get the votes needed, so they implemented it anyway. Much superior.

It's just like democracy. Without the "dem(b)" part. Much better now.

We have such warm feelings about it! What could possibly go wrong with doing such strong governance and extreme-right parties polling at record highs in more than half the EU countries? We have warm feelings now. Or maybe the warm feelings the result of 30 years of climate action in the EU. Luckily, the extreme right is hard at work defending our right to airconditioning!

reply
Children die from wrongly-prepared food, thus we should only allow people to eat at McDonald's from now on! /s
reply
When they run out of other rights to destroy, they will pipe videos of little girls crying from food poisoning into your e-verified telescreen during ChildSafe^TM viewing hours, and the result will be that you will get to choose between two state approved restaurants thereafter.
reply
Two? Since the Franchise Wars, all restaurants are Taco Bell.
reply