upvote

points

by kokanee2 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby 3uler1 hours ago|
next
[-]
Your tells, are just someone’s good writing now in the training set. It’ll be a moving target with each model.

I use the humanize skill to clean up AI written work before handing it over to colleagues.

https://github.com/blader/humanizer

reply
upvoteby ryandrake1 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
If the next generation of AI content produced no recognizable LLM patterns, and was indistinguishable from an actual human author, would you still care and try to determine whether the content was AI produced?
reply
upvoteby seba_dos11 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Of course. The "content" is how humans communicate with each other, it doesn't just exist for its own sake (except in some degenerate cases). If you know that a human has authored it, you can infer their intent and thought-process from various choices they made across it. There's no such thing as intentional choices when the content is generated though.
reply
upvoteby phoghed1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
I’ve asked essentially the same question many times to many people, the short answer is “yes” because it’s a matter of ideology not logic for them.

I get just as mad about shitty human output as I do about shitty LLM output. The bad thing about LLMs is that they have increased the volume of shit most people have to sift through.

When you open a requirements doc and it’s got 13 load bearing em dashes on the first page you known it’s gonna be bad day

reply
upvoteby lpribis1 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
I would like to know if text is LLM generated even if I can't tell from the content itself. For me it's a matter of attention (hah) and a quality signal. The poster expects to spend a minimal amount of effort on the post, and all the readers will have to spend the same amount of attention whether its LLM generated or not.

To me, it's disrespectful to expect someone to waste their day reading every word of a blog post when even the author has not read every word. It shows that you value your time over your reader's time.

reply
upvoteby kokanee1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
I want to know when I'm consuming AI content because the source of information matters. I want to know what was at stake for the author, what motives they had and didn't have, what biases I should be aware of, and, for example, whether I'm reading content farmed slop that exists solely to attract ad impressions.
reply
upvoteby phoghed36 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
You still won’t know even if it’s labeled though. Someone could put an incredible amount of effort into writing something, not be satisfied with some aspect, and have an LLM refactor it for example. Now you’ve got a lot of em dashes and you issue a shallow dismissal.

There was an HN submission recently where the author spent a lot of time and effort working with an LLM to write a story and get the LLM to follow a specific style and whatnot. Wish I could recall it offhand. Many commenters were very upset when they found out it was LLM generated, even though they couldn’t tell while reading it.

Basically what matters to me is some combo of how much effort went into it, and how accurate it is.

reply
upvoteby 1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
deleted
reply
upvoteby Dylan168071 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
It causes problems to outsource core parts of your work to someone else, even without AI. So yeah I still care.
reply