upvote
> The problem described in the article is unsolvable

Well, not completely unsolvable. But nobody would like the solution.

What all these scams rely on is a way to transfer money in an irrevocable fashion. Restrict that in meaningful ways and you end a lot of the abilities for these scams to operate.

You could, for example, outlaw gift cards as a start. You could force the likes of Western Union to have a holding period before releasing money. Crypto would be hard as any regulation against it is pretty easily circumvented, but you could outlaw crypto currency exchanges (I'd worry less about crypto though as it's pretty hard for grandma to reliably setup).

reply
Also cash? Scammers will (and do) send a mule to your house to pick up boxes of cash.
reply
You certainly could.

There's a reason scammers rely heavily on things like gift cards, it's because hiring mules is expensive and creates a trail police can follow back to the scammers. It requires them to be in the same locale as the person they are scamming. Mailing cash is also pretty dicey for the scammers because you have to send the mail to a valid address. That becomes something police can trace.

If you wanted to completely eliminate scams then yeah, you'd also outlaw cash.

reply
> (I'd worry less about crypto though as it's pretty hard for grandma to reliably setup).

Difficulty in setting up a money transfer is not a hindrance. I have heard stories of scammers walking someone through the entire process to getting a mortgage on a house on the A&E Intervention episode of Greg. If they think you have money and they think you are gullible, they will devote time and effort to getting it.

reply
Also education. No court or attorney is going to demand payment of any fines or bail in gift cards or send a courier to pick up cash.

High schools should teach how to spot a scam. As others have observed, this is not a new one, it's just gotten more high-tech and convincing. This is one of many practical things our schools should teach about that they just don't.

reply
Education can only do so much. And, really unfortunately, as people age their brains don't work as well as they once did in their youth.

That's the primary reason why so many scammers target old people. It's less to do with education and more to do with the fact that as people age they become naturally more trusting.

reply
When does that start. Because at 60 I'm far less trusting than I was at 30. Seen too much of the worst of people and less and less of the best.
reply
> (I'd worry less about crypto though as it's pretty hard for grandma to reliably setup)

These scumbags send grandma to a Bitcoin ATM.

reply
Most usage of Bitcoin ATMs (they're actually "reverse ATMs"0 in America is for these scams. Eliminating them would be a great start; they really have no legitimate purpose.

A while ago, some police department simply seized them and the cash inside and reimbursed victims with the proceeds thereof.

reply
I didn't know that they (the reverse ATMs) were being outlawed until i saw a Kitboga + AARP interview on youtube the other day.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A4uKSvFU40

Kitboga is a dang hero.

reply
Yet all of this can be easily defeated with soft language. The basic check "what's the password/verification word" will defeat this every time. This is basically opsec that we taught my grandparents, who were in their 90s. Its doable.
reply
Yes but that's more of a mitigation than prevention. It's an additional step, you have to remember to do it, and under the pressure of the situation you might easily forget to do it.
reply
Code words break down emotionally. Many seniors do not reliably trust their own memory during a frightening call
reply
So they trick the kid out of the password first by calling them and pretending to be the parent.
reply
How is that possible?

The procedure is:

1. Kid tells password to parent in person. 2. From then on: when kid calls parent, if kid requests anything sensitive, parent ask for the password, and kid must provide it. 3. Password is never mentioned over the phone in any other situation.

How would anyone be able to extract the password from the kid?

reply
"Kid/Grandma, someone is trying that scam where they pretend to be you on a call!"

"Oh my gosh Dad/Son! You know we have a password for that!"

"Yes -- actually, use it now so WE BOTH KNOW YOU'RE NOT A SCAM!"

"Sure, Dad/Son! It's DOUBLE CHEESEBURGER!"

"Thanks!"

reply
Hilarious. “Hey, someone who says they’re you is calling me. Remind me again what the password is that they’re supposed to say?”

“Grandma the password is ‘Integra’ but I can just tell you now, it’s not me calling you, it must be a sca—“

“Thanks got it byeeeeee” <scammer calls grandma>

reply
But kid knows not to give password to a caller.
reply
I don't know about that but finding excuses for the scum of this earth is certainly not a solution.

Take Europe for example: nobody dies of hunger in Europe. And yet there are plenty of thieves. People stealing tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of EUR aren't doing it to "feed their families".

Think of the situation today. Think of the victims today. Instead of thinking of tomorrow's hypothetical situation where supposedly all the honest fathers out of work would join the crime syndicate, think of today's victims.

Projecting your own insecurity about the future to excuse scummy behavior by the scum of this earth is of no help.

There are people, right now, who have a roof. Who have a family. And who are fucking scums stealing the hard earned money of others because they choosed the easy life of crime.

Zero tolerance for such motherfuckers. I care about the victims and you should too.

reply
> Take Europe for example: nobody dies of hunger in Europe.

Nobody? France, as the most extreme example, has a rate of 1.52 per 100K. That's about a thousand people a year. That is certainly a small percentage of the population, but it isn't "nobody".

https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/cause-of-death/malnutrit...

reply
> That's about a thousand people a year.

Eh, maybe.

Some of those may be hospice-style scenarios, where starvation is technically the cause of death at times. https://www.ccjm.org/content/ccjom/70/6/548.full.pdf

reply
Not sure I understand the argument.

Obviously there are people who help themselves to others' money if given the chance no matter the circumstances. But if the circumstances change so that people DO start going hungry or homeless, which is a rather obvious side effect of AI-but-not-AGI maximalism brightly espoused by our overlords sama and amodei of the "I can’t wait to make half the knowledge workers worldwide obsolete" variety, the scale of the problem will obviously get worse, as well as the type of people you can get involved if you’re in the international scam market.

reply
> scum of the earth

> fucking scums

> Zero tolerance for such motherfuckers

Who watches the watchers etc.

We will just end up with some jingoist dude that will go after us instead.

Slow reforms to regulate the banking industry with this "identity theft" nonsense...

reply
Could be prevented by more advanced "AI detection", especially on calls from unknown numbers.

It doesn't even have to be based on watermarking. It could be as simple as, "hold on a sec your AI countermeasure was listening and noticed you got this suspicious call, please be aware this may be a scam. Here is what you should do next..."

reply