upvote
The issue is that most corps disable Windows Update and only allow whatever goes through the on-prem Windows Update thingy. This can, of course, fire back if they don't think to include all the updates. We had one such issue where they didn't provide an up-to-date Intel driver for the Wi-Fi cards, and the version we had was a bit broken...

But the point is that companies will probably not complain about this because they'll most likely not see it. Also, they're used to Windows being generally crappy.

reply
Ah, the usual take. Want to sign everything before it can run, but take responsibility for nothing. And when in doubt, well, the computer did it.

When do we start calling out this crap?

reply
It's not the computer that did it. Microsoft did it. Microsoft enabled random hardware with random strings in their connection protocol metadata to point to software on the internet that Windows happily downloads and installs.

Strangely, nobody who runs linux has this problem.

Perhaps because windows "drivers" are so bloated with helper apps and other stuff that they can't possibly all be shipped to end users with the core OS.

reply
You'd get better results starting a conspiracy theory about it which took hold within right-wing circles, but it's less work to just not use it.
reply
Honestly yeah

MS should get all the flack (which is mostly deserved) of this

Manufacturer does whatever crap they want with "it works" and then MS gets the complaints

A driver should only be that. A driver

reply
> MS should get all the flack (which is mostly deserved) of this

I don't see why we can't blame both here? And I'm a big LG user, I'm writing this comment via a LG monitor, our main TV is LG, dishwasher and clotheswasher is also LG. But still, that Microsofts enables this behavior should rightly put them at the stake for this, and also LG should get flack too, just because something is possible doesn't mean you have to automatically go that route.

reply
well you can plug the same monitor into a mac and not have this issue.
reply
I don't use it with a Mac, and I already don't have that issue :) Kind of besides the point, LG should still get flack for it, even if it doesn't happen for me on the platform I use.
reply
We can

I don't think "should" is the best word here, I mean it more like "They will (eventually)"

But what they should/are aware of (and work against) is shenanigans by the HW vendors

reply
> A driver should only be that. A driver

I still remember the massive amounts of crapware installed with video cards, printers (hello, HP), and just about anything where the manufacturer can squeeze some money from.

reply
This was always one of my biggest pet peeves on Windows. A bunch of junk running in the system tray just for basic hardware functionality.
reply
> A driver should only be that. A driver

What does a monitor even need a driver for? I presume if you plug one of these into a Mac or a Linux box it’s still going to function.

reply