upvote
There’s a psychological factor. Many people believed it wasn’t humanly possible to do a sub 4 minute mile before Bannister accomplished it.

Once that was done the flood gates opened and many others broke it in the following months. This is the “central governor” theory in endurance sports.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_governor

reply
Nah, common misconception.

Progress had been steady for decades, but was interrupted by WW2.

There was one other person who did it a sub 4 minute a month and a half after him, then 3 more people the next year.

It was more down to improvement in training (Bannister was doing interval training, which was a new idea at the time).

reply
Not everybody who can run, runs. Not everybody who runs, runs close to their full potential. Even elite athletes have a life that can “get in the way.” Many who run close to their full potential get injured and set their training back.
reply
[flagged]
reply
Why do you think this comment is helpful?
reply
[flagged]
reply
I think a lot of it is also more people doing the sports.

We are assuming the old record is "the best a human can do because one person did it best" or some form of that.

There are likely hundreds or thousands of people alive right now who could break this record given the same lifestyle and training.

reply
I think OP meant "raw human performance" rather than "raw human potential".

IMO, better training counts as "raw performance". I think that's more interesting than somebody happening to be born with a genetic advantage.

reply